Six accounts payable automation best practices in the order that works, the AP challenges that stall projects, and the metrics to track, with 2025 benchmarks.
Quick answer
The core accounts payable automation best practices are: clean your supplier data first, give every invoice one digital front door, capture every field including line items and check it, match invoices to POs automatically and route exceptions to people, build fraud controls into approvals and payments, and measure cost per invoice, cycle time, exception rate and straight-through rate. Do them in that order, because each step depends on the one before it.
Why listen to us: ECIT Digital processes supplier invoices for finance teams every day. Our AI reads every invoice, our people check what the AI is unsure about, and we guarantee 99.8% accuracy on the data we deliver into your ERP or AP tool.
Last year I bought a robot vacuum, named it Dusty, and set it loose on a floor covered in cables, socks and one suspicious Lego brick [you can see where this is going]. Dusty now lives under the sofa, wrapped in a phone charger, beeping for help at 3am.
I had automated a mess, and the mess won. AP teams do the exact same thing with invoices, just with more zeros on the bill. This guide covers the best practices that stop that from happening, in the order you should tackle them, plus the challenges that trip teams up [Dusty will be back, he always is].
On this page
Here is the whole guide in one table, for the reader who skips to the end of mystery novels [no judgement, I do it too].
| Best practice | Why it matters | Where to start |
|---|---|---|
| Fix the process first | Automation copies your process, flaws included | Map how an invoice moves today |
| One front door for invoices | Scattered inboxes mean lost and late invoices | One address, one queue, e-invoices welcome |
| Capture every field and check it | Every later step trusts the captured data | Header and line items, with validation |
| Aim for touchless, plan for exceptions | Exceptions eat most of the AP team's time | Auto-match to PO and receipt |
| Fraud controls in the workflow | Fake bank detail changes are a top fraud route | Verify every bank change by phone |
| Measure four metrics | You cannot improve what you do not count | Cost, cycle time, exceptions, straight-through |
Most guides hand you 15 tips in random order, like a shuffled IKEA manual [step 1: attach the doors]. The order matters more than the tips, because each step trusts the data from the one before it.
So yes, the boring supplier cleanup comes first. Nobody has ever thrown a party for a clean supplier list, but every working AP automation sits on top of one.
Automation does exactly what your process does, only faster, which is great news for good processes and terrible news for Dusty. Before you buy anything, map how an invoice moves through your company today, from arrival to payment.
Our guides to the accounts payable process and the AP workflow walk through each step. Look for the loops: invoices emailed to three people, approvals that sit in someone's inbox for a week, suppliers paid twice because the same PDF arrived twice [twice the PDF, twice the fun].
Paperless accounts payable starts with where invoices arrive. If they land in personal inboxes, a shared mailbox, the post room and a supplier portal, you have four front doors and at least one of them is unlocked.
Pick one address and one queue, and send every format into it: e-invoices, emailed PDFs and paper. Paper gets scanned once at the door, then handled like everything else [the fax machine is not invited].
| Invoice format | How it arrives | What happens at the door |
|---|---|---|
| E-invoice (PEPPOL, XML, EDI) | Network or API | Data goes straight in, nothing to read |
| Email to one invoice address | AI captures the fields, a person checks unsure ones | |
| Paper | Post | Scanned once, then handled like a PDF |
| Phone photo | Email, usually with an apology | Same as a PDF, if it is readable |
E-invoices are the best guests at this door. According to Ardent Partners, "slightly more than half (51.4%) of all invoices are submitted electronically", and 83% of AP leaders expect that number to grow. The Federal Reserve calls e-invoices "a necessary first step to achieving straight-through processing".
Outside the US it is becoming law. The EU adopted its VAT in the Digital Age package on 11 March 2025, with digital reporting for cross-border B2B trade from 1 July 2030. If you trade with Europe, read what an e-invoice is and how PEPPOL e-invoicing works [pronounced "pep-ol", not "people", I checked].
Getting suppliers on board: tell them the new address in writing, give them a date, and stop accepting invoices anywhere else after it. Suppliers adapt fast once the old inbox stops answering.
This is the accounts payable invoice processing best practice everything else depends on. If the amount is captured wrong, matching fails, approvers sign off on the wrong number, and the bank happily pays it [banks never question a typo].
| What to capture | Why AP needs it | How to check it |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier and bank details | Paying the right party | Compare against the supplier master |
| Invoice number and date | Spotting duplicates and due dates | Flag repeats from the same supplier |
| PO number | Matching | Check that the PO exists and is open |
| Line items: quantity and unit price | Two-way and three-way matching | Compare against the PO and goods receipt |
| Tax and total | Posting the right amount | Lines plus tax must equal the total |
Header fields alone are not enough to match against a PO, you need the lines. And AI capture is fast, but it does not always know when it is wrong [neither do I, but I have an excuse].
So a person should check every field the AI is unsure about. That is where most tools stop and leave the checking to you. Our invoice scanning works differently, which is why we can put a number on it.
Invoice capture with a person behind it
ECIT Digital reads every invoice with AI, our team checks every field the AI is unsure about, and clean data goes into your ERP or AP tool with 99.8% accuracy guaranteed. You pay per document, with no license. See how AP automation works with us.
Touchless invoice processing means an invoice goes from arrival to approved without anyone touching it. It is the goal, and like my goal of running a marathon, most teams are not there yet [I own the shoes, that counts].
In Ardent Partners' 2025 benchmark, the average AP team processed 35.4% of invoices straight-through, and 18.4% of invoices became exceptions. Ardent's Andrew Bartolini says exceptions "continue to be the bane of AP's existence".
So design for both paths. Let invoices that match a PO and a goods receipt flow straight through, using clear tolerance rules. Read our guide to purchase orders vs invoices if two-way and three-way matching are still fuzzy.
| What the invoice does | Where it goes |
|---|---|
| Matches PO and goods receipt, within tolerance | Straight through to approval or payment |
| Price or quantity outside tolerance | Buyer or purchasing, to confirm with the supplier |
| No PO number | Budget owner, to approve and code |
| Same supplier and invoice number seen before | Blocked as a possible duplicate |
| Supplier bank details differ from the master | Held until verified by phone |
Then give exceptions an owner, a queue and a deadline, so they stop living in someone's inbox like Dusty under the sofa [still beeping]. Our invoice reconciliation guide covers how to close the loop at month end.
Fraudsters love AP, because AP is the team whose job is to send money to people who ask for it nicely. According to the AFP 2026 Payments Fraud and Control Survey, 76% of US organizations experienced attempted or actual payments fraud in 2025, and 74% were hit by business email compromise.
The classic trick is a fake supplier asking you to update their bank details. In the 2025 edition of the same survey, vendor imposter fraud was cited by 45% of respondents [the "new bank, who dis" email].
| Control | What it stops | How |
|---|---|---|
| Phone check on bank changes | Fake supplier bank detail requests | Call a number already on file, never the one in the email |
| Segregation of duties | One person adding and paying a fake supplier | Different people set up suppliers, approve and pay |
| Duplicate blocking | The same invoice paid twice | Flag repeat supplier and invoice number pairs |
| Approval thresholds | Large payments slipping through | A second approver above a set amount |
The US GAO puts the second row plainly: "Segregation of duties helps prevent fraud, waste, and abuse". And duplicates are not rare: APQC benchmarks show even top performers report 0.8% of annual disbursements as duplicate or erroneous payments, and bottom performers 2% [the PDF that arrived twice, again].
Software can flag a changed bank account or a duplicate invoice number in seconds. It cannot pick up the phone and sound suspicious, which remains a proudly human skill.
If you only track one thing, track cost per invoice. If you track four, add cycle time, exception rate and straight-through rate, and you will know more than most AP dashboards, which mostly show a pie chart nobody asked for.
| Metric | What it tells you | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Cost per invoice | What it costs to process one invoice | $9.84 average, $2.65 best-in-class (Ardent 2025) |
| Cycle time | Days from arrival to approved | 8.2 days average, 2.9 days best-in-class |
| Exception rate | Share of invoices that need a person | 18.4% average, 11.1% best-in-class |
| Straight-through rate | Share processed with no touch | 35.4% average, 51.0% best-in-class |
Benchmarks: Ardent Partners, State of ePayables 2025, sponsored by Bottomline.
APQC's older benchmarks tell the same story: top-quartile organizations spend $2.07 or less per invoice, against $10 or more for the bottom quartile. Measure yours before you change anything, otherwise you cannot prove the change worked [Dusty's app says he cleaned 100% of the floor, so apps do lie].
Every vendor has an ROI calculator, and every ROI calculator somehow concludes you should buy from that vendor [shocking, I know]. Build yours from your own numbers instead, because those are the only ones your CFO will believe.
For scale: Ardent notes that in the early 2000s, "average invoice processing costs could easily exceed $20 per invoice". Today the average is $9.84, so the gap between average and best-in-class is where your case lives.
AP automation projects rarely fail because of the software. They fail because of approvals, exceptions and suppliers, the three horsemen of the AP apocalypse [the fourth one is month end].
Ardent's 2025 survey found the top challenge, "called out by 49% of AP executives, is the length of time it takes to approve invoices and payments", followed by invoice exceptions at 48% and fraud risk at 31%. Here is what we see behind each one.
| Challenge | Why it happens | What helps |
|---|---|---|
| Slow approvals | Approvers are busy and invoices are not their job | Mobile approval, reminders, backup approvers, thresholds |
| Too many exceptions | Missing POs, price and quantity mismatches | PO discipline, tolerance rules, an owned exception queue |
| Suppliers keep using old channels | Nobody told them, or nobody enforced it | A written switch date, then one front door only |
| Bad captured data | AI extraction without a check | Validation rules and a person on unsure fields |
| ERP integration | Every ERP and AP tool expects a different format | A provider that exports to your system by API |
| Team pushback | People fear the tool replaces them | Show them the typing goes, the judgement stays |
AI adoption is a challenge of its own. Ardent found "fewer than half of AP teams (44%) currently using AI technologies", and 22% have no immediate plans to adopt it. That is fine: you do not need AI everywhere, just in capture, where it does the most typing.
Big-bang rollouts make great war stories and terrible quarters. Go in stages instead.
Measure the baseline
Cost per invoice, cycle time, exception rate and straight-through rate, before anything changes.
Clean the supplier master
Merge duplicates, verify bank details, set the coding rules.
Open the front door
One invoice address, then tell suppliers the switch date.
Start with one entity or supplier group
Pilot with real invoices, including the ugly ones.
Run old and new side by side
Compare the output for a few weeks before you switch off the manual process.
Expand and re-measure
Roll out to the rest, then compare against your baseline.
Choosing tools? Our comparison of the best AP automation software covers the options, including providers where people check the data for you [shameless, but relevant].
The bar is rising, too. Hackett Group research on AP providers reports that "leading solutions achieve 60% touchless, straight-through processing", so touchless is not a fantasy, it is just a project.
From where we sit, between our clients' invoices and their ERPs, the patterns repeat. Here is what the teams who get this right have in common [spoiler: none of them own a Dusty].

"Construction invoices are complex and highly variable and ECIT provided a flexible and extensible data extraction model that worked wonderfully." - Terence Pua, CEO, Hinges AI
AP automation, done for you
Our AI reads every invoice, our team checks what the AI is unsure about, and the data goes straight into your ERP or AP tool. You pay per document, with no license.
As for Dusty: I finally picked up the cables, cleaned the floor, and set him off again. He has not been stuck once since [he is still afraid of the Lego brick]. Clean first, then automate. That is the whole guide, really.
Written by
Sondre Bratlandsmo
Date
November 3, 2026
Category
Learn how the ECIT Digital solutions can help you with the help from one of our experts.


Clean your supplier data first, give every invoice one digital front door, capture every field including line items and check it, match invoices to purchase orders automatically and route exceptions to people, build fraud controls into approvals and payments, and measure cost per invoice, cycle time, exception rate and straight-through rate. Doing them in that order matters, because each step depends on the one before it.
In Ardent Partners' 2025 survey, AP leaders named slow invoice and payment approvals as the top challenge (49%), followed by invoice exceptions (48%) and fraud risk (31%). Other common challenges are suppliers who keep using old invoice channels, poor quality captured data, and integration with the ERP.
Touchless invoice processing means an invoice moves from arrival to approval without anyone handling it manually. The data is captured, validated and matched to the purchase order and goods receipt automatically. Invoices that fail a rule become exceptions and go to a person.
Track four: cost per invoice, invoice cycle time, exception rate and straight-through processing rate. Measure them before you automate, so you can show what changed afterwards.
It depends on your invoice volumes, the number of entities and the systems the data must reach. With ECIT Digital, our team handles the setup and the ERP connection, and maps a concrete go-live plan for your volumes and systems.
Pricing models vary. Many vendors charge a software license plus setup, while others charge per invoice processed. ECIT Digital charges per document, with extra cost only for additional fields or features, and no license fee.